분자유전학실험실 (단국대학교 분자생물학과)



 이성욱 ( 2017-09-02 14:29:13 , Hit : 539
 Scientists Doubt Results of CRISPR’d Embryos

The Scientist »
The Nutshell

http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/50241/title/Scientists-Doubt-Results-of-CRISPR-d-Embryos/&utm_campaign=NEWSLETTER_TS_The-Scientist-Daily_2016&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=55892330&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-9p0p4Os2p3LcRA3PwcoLAwyInWJocAcHSHYXLmstt7lZ8bs-IQa_ntJAF9hWELjIf8YhR6O4BJg_RnaRryTtnbJrxkTg&_hsmi=55892330

Six scientists question the authors’ conclusions about the DNA repair process that led to the human embryos’ correction of a defective gene.

By Aggie Mika | August 31, 2017


In a seminal study published earlier this month in Nature, researchers used CRISPR gene-editing technology to repair a heart-disease inducing genetic mutation in human embryos. But not everyone in the scientific community bought their results.

This week, six scientists published a critique of the paper in the open-access preprint server bioRxiv. The team of skeptics, including Maria Jasin of Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, took issue with one unexpected finding, namely, that the embryos used the healthy maternal DNA as a template to correct the defective sequence, rather than the DNA provided externally by the researchers.

The authors of the Nature paper, led by Shoukhrat Mitalipov of Oregon Health & Science University, targeted a small genetic mutation in the MYBPC3 gene known to cause hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. They fertilized eggs from healthy donors with sperm from a man who harbors the defective gene and suffers from the condition. They wanted see if they could excise the snippet of diseased paternal DNA with CRISPR and replace it with a healthy sequence they had made in the lab.

See “Details Published on CRISPR-treated Embryos”

According to Mitalipov’s team, the CRISPR’d embryos did something surprising: instead of taking up the mutation-free MYBPC3 DNA sequence, the embryos repaired the deletion using the homologous maternal sequence.

But the data presented by Mitalipov and his colleagues didn’t convince the group of skeptics, as “such a feat has not been observed in previous CRISPR experiments,” ScienceInsider reports.

In their dissenting paper, the critics assert that “the cell biology of fertilized eggs would appear to preclude the direct interaction between the maternal and paternal genomes” necessary for the homology directed repair mechanism that Mitalipov and colleagues describe.

“Clear evidence for a novel linkage of maternal and paternal alleles is an imperative,” which, the critics write, Mitalipov’s group did not provide. “Direct verification of gene correction,” including whether the maternal-for-paternal swap occurred, is possible, Jasin tells STAT.

As ScienceInsider reports, Jasin’s group outlines two alternative possibilities: the embryos developed without the paternal DNA in the first place, which has been known to happen, or the defective MYBPC3 gene was never actually replaced with the disease-free DNA.

Mitalipov and his colleagues “stand by [their] study’s key finding that human embryos are capable of effectively repairing disease-causing mutations by using a normal copy of the gene from a second parent as a template,” Mitalipov tells The Scientist in an email. He points out that the authors of the critique don’t offer any contradictory data, and says that his team intends to publish a response to each of the authors’ concerns.

“We recognize that these results must be confirmed by additional studies,” writes Mitalipov, and “encourage other scientists to reproduce our findings by conducting their own experiments on human embryos and publishing their results.”







1047   CRISPR/Cas9 Edits Epigenome with Therapeutic Efficiency  이성욱 2017/12/09 485
1046   [바이오토픽] 체크포인트 저해제의 부작용: 자가면역질환 초래  이성욱 2017/11/16 686
1045   DNA Repair Mechanism Aids Cancer by Mending Chemo Damage  이성욱 2017/11/10 568
1044   FDA Approves Gilead CAR-T Therapy Yescarta, Plans Regenerative Medicine Policy 'Soon'  이성욱 2017/10/20 608
1043   Advisors to FDA Recommend Approval of Gene Therapy for Blindness  이성욱 2017/10/14 665
1042   CRISPR System Targets RNA in Mammalian Cells  이성욱 2017/10/06 640
1041   Nonviral CRISPR Delivery a Success  이성욱 2017/10/03 555
1040   Giants of Circadian Biology Win Nobel Prize  이성욱 2017/10/03 499
1039   To Speed CRISPR/Cas9’s Search and Snip, Try Extra Cas9 and gRNA  이성욱 2017/09/30 1989
1038   Technique Adapted from CRISPR-Cas9 Corrects Mutation in Human Embryos  이성욱 2017/09/29 505
1037   Mutations Making CRISPR Hyper-Accurate Discovered  이성욱 2017/09/22 853
1036   CRISPR Used in Human Embryos to Probe Gene Function  이성욱 2017/09/22 582
1035   Alcoholism Gene Therapy Shows Promise  이성욱 2017/09/20 582
1034   DNA Construction  이성욱 2017/09/15 660
1033   Cargo-Sorting DNA Robots  이성욱 2017/09/15 1139
1032   From Startups to Moguls] CRISPR 유전자가위 없이 편집한다? Homology Medicines  이성욱 2017/09/11 604
1031   Outsourcing Gene Editing to the Public-Online Game Challenges Players to Design CRISPR On/Off Switch  이성욱 2017/09/05 722
  Scientists Doubt Results of CRISPR’d Embryos  이성욱 2017/09/02 539
1029   Scientists Look to Epigenetics to Thwart Viruses  이성욱 2017/09/02 709
1028   First CAR T-Cell Therapy Approved in U.S.  이성욱 2017/09/01 690

[이전 10개] [1]..[11] 12 [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20]..[64] [다음 10개]
 

Copyright 1999-2021 Zeroboard / skin by ROBIN