분자유전학실험실 (단국대학교 분자생물학과)



 이성욱 ( 2016-06-14 22:45:47 , Hit : 1030
 CRISPR Antidotes Galore

The Scientist » News & Opinion » Daily News
Anti-CRISPR proteins are prevalent in phage genomes and bacterial mobile genetic elements, researchers show.

By Anna Azvolinsky | June 13, 2016

Diverse groups of bacterial species encode genes that block the activity of specific CRISPR/Cas systems, according to a team from the University of Toronto and the University of Otago, New Zealand. Scanning prophages (genomes of bacteriophages integrated within bacterial genomes), Toronto’s Alan Davidson and colleagues have identified five new protein-coding anti-CRISPR genes, adding to the list of nine his group had previously identified. The team’s latest work, published today (June 13) in Nature Microbiology, highlights a way to learn how CRISPR systems work as well as a potential add-on tool for CRISPR-based gene editing.

“The authors report a beautiful application of the Red Queen theory, which posits that there is a kind of an arms race between all living organisms, and between the host and parasite in particular,” said Didier Raoult, a microbiologist at Aix-Marseille University in France who was not involved in the work. These proteins “are the phages’ answers to bacterial CRISPR systems which are a form of aggression by the bacteria,” he added.

“The discovery of anti-CRISPR proteins is not surprising in the sense that phage must develop these as part of the nature of the host-parasite co-evolution,” said Eugene Koonin of the US National Center for Biotechnology Information and the National Library of Medicine.

Davidson’s team in 2013 found that a single prophage within the Pseudomonas aeruginosa genome conferred resistance to a host of other types of phages. So the researchers tweaked the P. aeruginosa CRISPR systems to try to understand how the prophage might affect the bacterium’s susceptibility to phage infection. They found that P. aeruginosa’s type I-F CRISPR system only prevented infection by certain types of phage. Searching within the phage genomes, the researchers found five unique genes, each with anti-CRISPR activity. In a subsequent study, the researchers identified another four genes the showed activity against type I-E CRISPR in P. aeruginosa.

For the present study, Davidson’s team broadened its search to the genomes of species within the diverse Proteobacteria phylum. Because the nine previously identified proteins had no sequence motifs in common, the researchers searched for sequences with homology to a putative transcriptional regulator gene they found adjacent to all known anti-CRISPR loci.

Davidson and colleagues then tested whether each putative anti-CRISPR gene, expressed on a plasmid, could support the ability of phage to replicate within bacteria with either a type I-E and I-F CRISPR system targeting the phage. The group identified four more anti-CRISPR genes targeting the I-F system, plus one that is able to block the activity of both type I-F and I-E CRISPR systems.

“That there are a lot of different anti-CRISPR gene families emphasizes that these genes are advantageous to a phage and that the CRISPR system poses an important barrier to phage replication,” Davidson told The Scientist. All three of the anti-CRISPR proteins the team previously tested in vitro bound and blocked CRISPR function in a distinct way.

According to Raoult, these anti-CRISPR proteins may provide a clue as to why some bacterial and archaeal species retain foreign DNA elements (such as prophages and other mobile genetic elements) that encode for resistance genes, while others do not. “This is an important question,” said Raoult. “I suspect that one difference may be these anti-CRISPR proteins.”

Anti-CRISPR proteins may also be useful experimental tools. “It’s not difficult to imagine that these proteins could be used to modulate the activity of CRISPR systems for genomic editing and engineering in the same way that Cas9 mutants are now being used, or as a way to transiently regulate the expression of CRISPR,” said Koonin.

The Toronto-led team is now working on identifying more genes against other CRISPR systems, including the widely used CRISPR/Cas9.

“This is probably just the tip of the proverbial iceberg of the total number of anti-CRISPR proteins,” Koonin told The Scientist.  

A. Pawluk et al., “Inactivation of CRISPR-Cas systems by anti-CRISPR proteins in diverse bacterial species,” Nature Microbiology, doi:10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.85, 2016.







967   Revisiting CAR T-Cells for Treating HIV Shows Promise  이성욱 2016/07/19 794
966   코오롱, 유전자치료제 판매 허가 신청  이성욱 2016/07/12 896
965   Gilead wins U.S. nod for drug for all types of hepatitis C  이성욱 2016/06/30 969
964   줄기세포·유전자치료제 차세대 주자로 급부상  이성욱 2016/06/21 1125
963   Virus Hacks Host Genome, Steals CRISPR to Protect Itself  이성욱 2016/06/16 836
  CRISPR Antidotes Galore  이성욱 2016/06/14 1030
961   Let’s Synthesize the Human Genome, Says HGP-Write  이성욱 2016/06/04 852
960   A New CRISPR System for RNA  이성욱 2016/06/04 935
959   Scientists identify a novel CRISPR system that zeroes in on single-stranded RNA.  이성욱 2016/06/04 836
958   GSK gets EU approval for first gene therapy for children  이성욱 2016/05/30 873
957   Gene therapy drug approval granted to GSK  이성욱 2016/05/30 934
956   Mysterious Eukaryote Missing Mitochondria  이성욱 2016/05/17 853
955   Genetically Engineered Pigs May Fly as Cancer Models  이성욱 2016/05/17 922
954   Blame Daddy for Some Epigenetically Induced Birth Defects in Children  이성욱 2016/05/17 932
953   RNA 세상: 태초에 RNA의 퓨린은 어떻게 생성되었나?  이성욱 2016/05/13 1400
952   Three studies show that the virus can cause birth defects in mouse embryos.  이성욱 2016/05/13 1581
951   ‘로렌조 오일’ 유전자 치료로 효과  이성욱 2016/05/09 848
950   First Data from Anti-Aging Gene Therapy  이성욱 2016/04/28 869
949   정밀의학의 끝: 개인화된 종양백신을 개발하는 과학자들  이성욱 2016/04/26 1060
948   CRISPR Aids Identification of Sporadic Parkinson’s Mutation in GWAS  이성욱 2016/04/22 843

[이전 10개] [1]..[11][12][13][14][15] 16 [17][18][19][20]..[64] [다음 10개]
 

Copyright 1999-2021 Zeroboard / skin by ROBIN