분자유전학실험실 (단국대학교 분자생물학과)



 이성욱 ( 2017-07-14 19:43:28 , Hit : 670
 Anti-CRISPR Protein Reduces Off-Target Effects

The Scientist »
News & Opinion »
Daily News


http://www.the-scientist.com/?articles.view/articleNo/49852/title/Anti-CRISPR-Protein-Reduces-Off-Target-Effects/&utm_campaign=NEWSLETTER_TS_The-Scientist-Daily_2016&utm_source=hs_email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=54207731&_hsenc=p2ANqtz-_6eNDEkZQ3ZRKDXdDnLxNTtleFuHqGUhqm2dKSRwS_u67yaenhZ9C0D2N6ox4WBsRc4-5bWA9EDPj73YmSdRoNINDcHg&_hsmi=54207731



AcrIIA4, an inhibitor protein from the Listeria bacteriophage, can block DNA from binding to Cas9 during genome editing.

By Diana Kwon | July 12, 2017


SHIN ET AL., SCIENCE ADVANCES
Last December, two groups of scientists published their discoveries of several proteins that could block CRISPR-Cas9 activity. In a study published today (July 12) in Science Advances, researchers have now used one of those anti-CRISPR agents to reduce off-target effects in Cas9-mediated genome editing in human cells.

“CRISPRs have been recognized as bacterial immune systems for some time, and of course, one of the pretty common themes in biology is that if something develops a weapon, the target is going to develop a defense,” says study coauthor Jacob Corn, a professor of biochemistry and biophysics at the University of California, Berkeley. “It turns out that . . . the phages have evolved ways to fight off the CRISPR systems, and that’s these anti-CRISPR proteins.”

To study the mechanism behind one of these anti-CRISPR proteins, AcrIIA4, which was co-discovered by Corn’s collaborator, Joseph Bondy-Demony, a biologist at the University of California, San Francisco, the team used a variety of methods, including cryo-electron microscopy and human cell culture experiments.

See “Keeping CRISPR in Check”

Through a multi-lab effort, researchers discovered that this anti-CRISPR protein worked by attaching to a pocket on the Cas9 enzyme where DNA typically binds, preventing it from accessing DNA.

The team also examined the effectiveness of this system for gene editing in human cells using guide RNAs for the gene vascular endothelial growth factor A, which is notorious for its off-target effects, and the gene for haemoglobin, which Corn’s lab is using to investigate ways to correct the mutations behind sickle cell disease.

This analysis revealed that by adjusting the timing of when AcrIIA4 or Cas9 was added to an assay, the researchers could preferentially block off-target effects. “We found that if you pre-add AcrIIA4 and add Cas9 later, you’ve completely blocked gene editing,” Corn says. “But if you delay it by a little bit, six hours or so, then there’s really not a huge hit to on-target activity.”

See “More Anti-CRISPR Proteins to Block Cas9”

“Though the work and the results were very impressive and important, they weren’t particularly surprising,” says Erik Sontheimer, a professor in the University of Massachusetts’s RNA Therapeutics Institute. Sontheimer was not involved in the study, but he is a cofounder of Intellia Therapeutics, alongside study coauthor Jennifer Doudna of the University of California, Berkeley, and the company is using an anti-CRISPR protein that Sontheimer co-discovered (not AcrIIA4).. “This is a very logical way for an anti-CRISPR protein to act. [This] mechanism . . . has been well established previously in other systems, and DNA mimicry by a phage nuclease inhibitor protein has been observed before.”

Alan Davidson, a molecular geneticist at the University of Toronto who did not take part in the work, but is also collaborating with some of the study’s authors, points out that two very similar papers were recently published in Nature this April and Molecular Cell in June. “There’s basically the same structure, the same proteins, and the same conclusions,” says Davidson, who was Bondy-Demony’s graduate advisor and whose name is on a patent, along with Sontheimer, for three other anti-CRISPR compounds. “I think the only [difference] is the Science Advances paper has some data about genome editing, [showing that] expressing the anti-CRISPR while you’re genome editing could cut down the off-target effects.”

The rapid succession of these papers illustrates that “it’s a very competitive field,” Davidson adds. “To me, the most outstanding aspect of these papers, particularly the one that came out in Nature, was the tremendous speed [of the work].” Considering the initial discoveries of anti-CRISPR proteins were only published last December, he says, these studies were conducted at an incredibly rapid pace.

These anti-CRISPR proteins are likely to be a useful genetics, and perhaps clinical, tool. Not only will these proteins help reduce off-target effects, they could also be an effective way to control on-target effects, Corn says. For example, several methods of gene therapy may leave active Cas9 in patient cells, which clinicians would want to turn off. “It’s absolutely critical to have an on-switch for gene-editing, but it’s just as important to have an off switch,” he adds.

Before any of that happens, however, “there’s a lot of important efficacy and safety [investigations] that still need to be done,” Corn says. For example, scientists need to understand what the human immune response will be to these anti-CRISPR proteins, because they come from bacterial viruses. “We’re purely in research mode with the anti-CRISPR proteins,” he adds. “Who knows what other tools are out there, waiting for us to find.”

J. Shin et al, “Disabling Cas9 by an anti-CRISPR DNA mimic,” Science Advances, doi:e1701620, 2017.







1187   A Novel Mammalian Genomic Imprinting Mechanism  이성욱 2017/07/25 697
1186   Mammalian Immunity: What’s RNAi Got to Do with It?  이성욱 2017/07/25 603
1185   CRISPR Structure Data Reveal How Cas Enzymes Choose Target  이성욱 2017/07/25 984
  Anti-CRISPR Protein Reduces Off-Target Effects  이성욱 2017/07/14 670
1183   CRISPR Encodes Movie into Bacteria, Then DNA Sequencing Plays It  이성욱 2017/07/14 917
1182   [바이오토픽] CRISPR를 이용하여 세균의 DNA에 영화를 저장!  이성욱 2017/07/14 680
1181   [바이오토픽] FDA 자문위원회, CAR-T(chimeric antigen receptor T cell) 승인 만장일치로 권고  이성욱 2017/07/14 641
1180   유전자치료제 '인보사' 연골재생 입증못해도 허가받은 까닭  이성욱 2017/07/14 634
1179   코오롱 인보사허가  이성욱 2017/07/12 604
1178   CRISPR Platform Scans DNA to Predict Off-Target Effects  이성욱 2017/07/02 1035
1177   Fixing CRISPR  이성욱 2017/06/27 906
1176   [미국] 듀폰, 유전자가위 기술 적용 옥수수 출시를 위한 노력  이성욱 2017/06/22 777
1175   [바이오토픽] CRISPR를 역이용하는 파지(phage), 항생제내성 세균을 물리치는 신무기  이성욱 2017/06/22 1061
1174   [바이오 업계 소식: From Startups to Moguls] CRISPR-Cas9에 대한 경고와 업계 반응  이성욱 2017/06/14 610
1173   Was a Drop in CRISPR Firms’ Stock Warranted?  이성욱 2017/06/09 1120
1172   First In Vivo Human Genome Editing to Be Tested in New Clinical Trial  이성욱 2017/05/18 669
1171   독감바이러스의 ‘RNA 도둑질’  이성욱 2017/05/08 694
1170   More Tooth, More Tail in CRISPR Operations  이성욱 2017/04/25 819
1169   Gut Microbes Contribute to Age-Associated Inflammation in Mice  이성욱 2017/04/14 1312
1168   CRISPR Corrects Duchenne-Causing Mutations  이성욱 2017/04/14 735

[1][2][3][4] 5 [6][7][8][9][10]..[64] [다음 10개]
 

Copyright 1999-2020 Zeroboard / skin by ROBIN